Inter-philosophical Critique of Realpolitik from School of Machiavellianism and School of Legalism: Comparative and Dialectical Analysis of Role of Realpolitik Orientation on International Issues
Downloads
Machiavellianism and Legalism exerted influences over bureaucratic administration, balance of power competition, among state empires and Realpolitik-oriented competition that may remain observable in today’s world of geopolitical security dilemma and structural power asymmetry, notwithstanding little advancement as they design in absolute terms due to domestic mechanism and confinement of a more modernising, inclusive, non-Realpolitik international norm upon political behaviours of state actors or supreme political decision makers. Both of these philosophical schools attach significance not to benevolence, righteousness, and morality in the realm of governance of both domestic affairs and foreign affairs, but rather to power supremacy of the rulers, and bestows and punishments combined according to the degree of consistency between the behaviours of officials and results of their performance, and even tricky usage of tactical deception if needed in response to the complicated Realpolitik affairs and arena partly because they presuppose human nature is not benign but evil, selfish and transactional mostly for the sake of narrow self-interests, especially in a Realpolitik-based environment that they observe and identify and that only the ends justify the means. This analytical essay methodologically seeks to utilise certain representative case studies of Ukraine-Russia geopolitical security dilemma and US-China structural dilemma in a more unpredictable world where Realpolitik remains observable but its methodology is insufficient, for the purpose of dialectically evaluating potential theoretical merits and demerits of Machiavellianism and Legalism. Briefly, these two philosophical schools facilitate state actors, supreme decision makers and research analysts to undertake maximum non-emotive, rational observation of an authentic geopolitical world in a physical sense as it literally is, but they probably omit the normative progressive philosophical notion of reshaping an international arena on a normative basis of minimum zero-sum-game mentality and minimum vicious structural competition and confrontation and of possibility of interstate cooperation beyond the Realpolitik framework.
Anderson, P.(1974). Lineages of the Absolutist State. Verso.
Bao, B. L.J.(2022). Comparative Inter-Civilisational Formulas from School of Platonism and School of Confucianism: Inter-civilisational Theorisation of International Development Issues from Inter-philosophical Perspectives. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 9(3), 7539-7554.
Blahuta, J.P.(2015). Fortune and the Dao: A Comparative Study of Machiavelli, the Daodejing, and the Han Feizi, Lexington Books.
Cai, X.D. (2006). The Study on "Han Fei's Diplomacy Thought. [Master's Thesis, Jilin University]. https://www.docin.com/p-220190470.html
Centre of China and Globalisation. (2022, March26). The Impact of the Crisis in Ukraine on Global Supply Chains and China's Economy. http://en.ccg.org.cn/archives/75387.
Chen, H.Y.(2018). Machiavelli, Roman Empire and the Concept of "Oriental Despotism". Academics, 241(6), 233-243.
Curtis, M.(2009). Orentialism and Islam: European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India. Cambridge University Press.
Frankel, B.(1996). Restating the Realist Case: an Introduction. Security Studies, 5, ix-xx.
Han, F.(2003).Han Feizi: Basic Writing (B. Watson. Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Harris, E.(2021, May10). A Han Feizian Worry with Confucian Meritocracy- and a Non-Moral Alternative. Culture and Dialogue. www.brill.com/cad
Hentsch, T.(1992). Imagining the Middle East (F.A. Reed. Trans.). Black Rose Books.
Kafura, C. (2021, October4). Americans and US-China Trade Relations. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
Keohane, R.O.(1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy, Simon & Schuster.
Kuhn, R.L.(2022, February22). Look to history to inform China-US relations today. Global Times. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202202/1252881.shtml
Lucchese, F.D. (2015). Political Philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli, Edinburgh University Press.
Machiavelli, N. (2019). The Prince. Jilin University Press.
---. (1998). The Prince. (H. C. Mansfield. Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
---. (1996). Discourses on First Decade of Titus Livy. (H.C. Mansfield and N.Tarcov, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Moody, P. (2016). The Right and The Expedient: A Warring States Dialectic. Chinese Political Science Review, 2016(1), 134-148.
Morgan, K.(2021). Han Feizian Legalism as a Legitimate Political Theory. https://www.academia.edu/69548629/Han_Feizian_Legalism_as_a_Legitimate_Political_Theory
Morgenthau, H. J. & Thompson, K.W. & Clinton, D. (2005). Politics among Nations. McGraw-Hill Education.
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.
Najemy, J. M. (2009). Machiavelli Between East and West, In From Florence to the Mediterranean and beyond. https://www.storiadifirenze.org/pdf_ex_eprints/76-Najemy.pdf
Rogers, R.A.(2022). History Rhymes: The Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Beijing Review, 2022(14), 20-21.
Rubiés, J.P. (2005). Oriental Despotism and European Orientalism: Botero to Montesquieu. Journal of Early Modern History, 9(1), 109-180.
Valensi, L.(1993). The Birth of the Despot: Venice and the Sublime Porte. Cornell University Press.
Viroli, M.(1990). Machiavelli and the Republican Idea of Politics, In Machiavelli and Republicanism. Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Random House.
Wang, T.Z.(1995). A Modern Diplomatic Principle from a Historical Perspective: Machiavellianism. Social Scinces in China. 1995(03), 90-99.
Wang, W.F.(2016). Vision Abandoned? --- Sino-US Long-Term Strategic Relations: The View from the US. Contemporary International Relations, 26(2), 25-39.
Watson, B.(2003). Introduction. From Han Feizi: Basic Writings (B. Watson. Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Wohlforth, W.C.(2010). Chapter 7: Realism, from The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, (C. Reus-smit and D. Sindal. Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Xi, Biden pledge to steer China-U.S. relations back on right track. (2021, November17). Xinhua News. https://cbgc.scol.com.cn/news/2437679.
Chinese Wisdom in Xi's Words: "A just cause should be pursued for the common good". (2022, March23). Xinhua News.
http://en.youth.cn/RightNow/202203/t20220323_13553055.htm
Yang, Z.Y.(2020). Comparative Studies of Management Concepts of Han Feizi and Machiavelli. Journal of Liaoning Economy Vocational and Technical College. 1(2020), 1-6.
Yang, Z.H.(2015). The Concepts of Li and Fa as Well as their Legal Expression in Ancient China as Seen in the Excavated Qin and Han Documents: a Discussion of the Theory of the Confucianisation of Ancient Chinese Law. Journal of Ancient Civilizations, 30(2015), 1-64.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
