Research on the Creativity of High School Students in Da Nang City
Downloads
Creativity is now said to be an important and top priority in education today. This is an important personality quality of a person expressed through thoughts and actions, especially ideas or products, solutions that a person offers to a problem, and creativity is the main factor that helps a person stand out or be different from others. The study was conducted on 222 students from 2 groups of gifted schools and non-gifted high schools in Da Nang city in order to describe the reality of students' awareness and creativity level, find out about the expressions, their constitutive elements of creativity and analyze the subjective and objective factors that affect high school students' creativity. Research results show that 80% of students are creative at an average level. One special thing is that factors of academic ability, age, or gender do not completely affect students' creativity. Moreover, factors that directly affect the creativity of students come mainly from the intrinsic motivation of the students themselves, the school and family environment is just the foundation for promoting students' creative motivation. From the above results, the study proposes some measures that partially affect the educational methods of schools and families, as well as directly affect the survey subjects.
Lê Nam Hải, Hà Thị Hoài Hương (2011), Nghiên cứu sáng tạo dưới quan điểm về Nhân cách, Tạp chí Khoa học, Đại học Huế, 68, 2011
Lieu Thi Bich Tran, Nhat Thi Ho, Robert J. (2016), Teaching for Creativity Development: Lessons Learned from a Preliminary Study of Vietnamese and International Upper (High) Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions and Lesson Plans Hurle, Creative Education, 7 (7)
Lê Thị Tuyết, Nguyễn Diệu Linh (2018), "Chỉ số sáng tạo của sinh viên khoa sinh học trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội và một số yếu tố liên quan", Khoa Sinh học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, HNUE Journal of Science, Natural Sciences 2018, 63(3), 158-166.
Nguyễn Đức Uy (1999), Tâm lý học sáng tạo, NXB Giáo dục, Hà Nội.
Nguyễn Công Khanh (2007), Báo cáo tổng hợp kết quả đề tài Nghiên cứu chỉ số sáng tạo của sinh viên, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội, ĐHQGHN, Hà Nội.
Phạm Thành Nghị (2011a). Phát triển tư duy sáng tạo thông qua hoạt động giải quyết vấn đề mới”, Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục, 68, 9-13.
Phạm Thành Nghị (2012), Giáo trình Tâm lý học sáng tạo, Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội
Alder H. (2002). CQ: Boost Your Creative Intelligence: Powerful Ways to Improve Your Creativity Quotient. Kogan Page, London, 12-28.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). Toward a Comprehensive Psychology of Creativity. The Social Psychology of Creativity, (203–209) as cited in R. J. Sternberg, Handbook of creativity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62-92.
Amabile, Teresa M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376
Amabile, T.M. (1996) Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note, 396-239
Amabile, Teresa, and Stanley Gryskiewicz (1987). “Creativity in the r&d Laboratory.” The report, Greensboro, NC.
Aranguren, M. & Irrazabal, N. (2012). A scale for the evaluation of Creativity Behavior in different domains: Development and design. Ciencias Psicológicas, 6(1), 29-41 as cited in Agustín Freiberg-Hoffmann, Carlos Vigh, and Mercedes Fernández-Liporace (Eds), "Creative Personality Scale. A new version for college students from Argentina", Annals of psychology 2019, 35(2), 290-299
Bill Lucas, Guy Claxton and Ellen Spencer (2012), Progression in Creativity: Developing new forms of assessment, Centre for Real-World Learning, The University of Winchester, England
Davis, G. A. (1992) Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 69-72
De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. New York: Harper & Row.
De Bono, E. (1985). Six Thinking Hats. London: Penguin Books.
Deci, E.L., Nezlek, J., & Sheiman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40.
Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. Harper.
Guastello, Stephen J. (1988), Creative Problem Solving Groups at the Edge of Chaos, Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(1), 38-57
Haddon, F. A., & Lytton, H. (1968). Teaching approach and the development of divergent thinking abilities in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 38(2).
Jensen J. Zhao, Sherry Y. Zhao (2010). The Impact of IQ+EQ+CQ Integration on Student Productivity in Web Design and Development. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(1), 43-53.
Herr, E. L., Moore, G. D., Hansen, J. C., & Castell, C. (1965). Creativity, intelligence, and values: A study of relationships. Exceptional Children, 32(2), 114–115.
Herrmann, N. (1988). The Creative Brain. Lake Lure, North Carolina: Brain Books
Lubart, T. I. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62-92
Lubart, T., & Guignard, J.-H. (2004). The Generality-Specificity of Creativity: A Multivariate Approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization, American Psychological Association, 43–56
Osborn, A.F. , 1953 (rev. 1957, 1963), Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving. New York.
Pippig, G (1988). “Pädagogische Psychologie”. Volk und Wissen, Volkseigener Verlag, Berlin.
Rea, D. (2003). Optimal Motivation for Creative Intelligence. Creative Intelligence: Toward Theoretic Integration, Chapter 9, 211–235.
Rosenthal, R., Baratz, S. S., & Hall, C. M. (1974). Teacher behavior, teacher expectations, and gains in pupils' rated creativity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 124(1), 115–121.
Taylor, D.W (1961), Environment and Creativity. In: Conference on the Creative Person. Uni. Calif. Inst of Personality Assessment and Research, Berkely.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Prentice Hall, Inc
Torrance, E. P. (1979). The Search for Satori and Creativity. New York Creative Education Foundation.
Torrance, E. P. (1987).Future Career Image as a Predictor of Creative Achievement in a 22-Year Longitudinal Study. Psychological Reports. 60(2), 574.
Urban K.K. (1995). Creativity - A component approach model, in Proceedings of 11th World Conference on the Education for the Gifted and Talented, Hong Kong.
Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or Burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal 8, 1–10.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
