Policy Analysis of Used Capital Fund of National Health Insurance (JKN) To Increase Employee Performance on Primary Healthcare (FKTP) Puskesmas in Pacitan
Downloads
Under the ministerial regulation no 21/2016 the payment of JKN service to the FKTP used capitation payment system. The payment given to the primary care is in the form of health service payment (minimum 60%). The allocation is based on types of workforce (profession, administrative tasks, person in charge of programs, and years of service) and attendance. This study investigates the possibility of adding employee performance as a variable in giving health service point for employees at FKTP Puskesmas. This study is a qualitative study in nature using case study design. The data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group discussion, and triangulation. Incentive payment increases the employee performance at work. The amount of incentives should line up with the employees performances. Incentives will not be effective if they are fixed and do not count the employees performances. In the ministerial regulation no 21/2016, healthcare service is not included as a variable in employee performance evaluation. The head of FKTP Puskesmas can use the results of employee performance evaluation to determine the amount of incentives received. One of the ways to improve employee performance is through reward and punishment system. Employee performance in Puskesmas can be increased by adding work performance evaluation as a variable capitation payment of BPJS Kesehatan to Puskesmas based on ministerial regulation (Permenkes) no 21/ 2016.
Kemenkes. Permenkes Nomer 21 tentang Penggunaan Dana Kapitasi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional untuk Jasa Pelayanan Kesehatan dan Dukungan Biaya Operasional pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama Milik Pemerintah Daerah. 2016.
(Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Podsakoff NP, Shaw JC, Rich BL. The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2010 Oct;77(2):157–67.
Maharanti S, Soedarso S, Asmita P, Susanna D. The Working Motivation of Doctors in the Era of National Health Insurance in Ngesrep Primary Health Care (PHC) 2015. KnE Life Sciences. 2018 May 17;4(4):311.
(Negussie N. Relationship Between Rewards And Nurses’ Work Motivation In Addis Ababa Hospitals. 2012;22(2):6.
Al-Hawary SIS, Banat NAE-F. Impact of Motivation on Job Performance of Nursing Staff in Private Hospitals in Jordan. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences [Internet]. 2017 May 1 [cited 2019 Feb 28];7(2). Available from: http://hrmars.com/index.php/journals/papers/IJARAFMS/v7-i2/2824
Hasan AG, Adisasmito WBB. Analisis Kebijakan Pemanfaatan Dana Kapitasi JKN pada FKTP Puskesmas di Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2016. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):127.
Kingma M. Can Financial Incentive Influence Medical Practice? 2004 Jun 12;12.
Riyadi S. Pengaruh Kompensasi Finansial, Gaya Kepemimpinan, dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Jawa Timur. jmk. 2011 Sep 30;13(1):40–5.
Norman AH, Russell AJ, Macnaughton J. The payment for performance model and its influence on British general practitioners’ principles and practice. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014 Jan;30(1):55–67.
Young SM, Selto F. Explaining cross-sectional workgroup performance differences in a JIT facility: A critical appraisal of a field-based study. Journal of Management Accounting Research. 1993 Jan 1;5:300–26.
Putra M. The Effect of Reward and Punishment to Performance of Driver Grabcar in Depok. 2020; (1):8.
Sarto F, Veronesi G. Clinical leadership and hospital performance: assessing the evidence base. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May;16(S2):169.
All Content should be original and unpublished.