The Mechanism and Interpretation of Fetal Non Stress Test and Cardiotocography
Downloads
Understanding fetal heart rate monitoring is essential for ensuring the health of the developing child during pregnancy and labor. Healthcare professionals rely on this monitoring to detect any irregularities or changes in the fetal heart rate, which can indicate fetal distress or compromise. Monitoring methods such as the nonstress test (NST) and cardiotocography (CTG) play a vital role in assessing fetal well-being, providing critical information about the fetus's health. NST is a non-invasive procedure that monitors fetal heart rate in response to movements. NST helps determine if the fetus is receiving sufficient oxygen and is free from distress. CTG, also known as electronic fetal monitoring, is a more comprehensive method that continuously records both fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. CTG is crucial in labor monitoring, offering real-time data that aids in the assessment of fetal well-being and the identification of potential issues such as hypoxia or abnormal labor patterns. Both NST and CTG play integral roles in ensuring optimal fetal health during pregnancy and labor. By providing valuable data on fetal heart rate responses, these monitoring techniques enable healthcare providers to make informed decisions, enhance the management of high-risk pregnancies, and improve overall outcomes.
Monson M, Heuser C, Einerson BD, et al. Evaluation of an external fetal electrocardiogram monitoring system: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223: 244.e1-244.e12.
Romano M. A Comprehensive Review of Techniques for Processing and Analyzing Fetal Heart Rate Signals Alfonso. Sensors 2021; 21: 1–32.
Enabudoso E. Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology for Developing Countries: eSecond Edition. In: Electronic fetal monitoring, pp. 159–173.
Singhania AT, Jahagirdar S, Junghare P, et al. Role of Admission Test NST and Its Outcome in Pregnancy. Int J Heal Allied Sci; 12. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.55691/2278-344x.1068.
David AL, Spencer RN. Clinical Assessment of Fetal Well-Being and Fetal Safety Indicators. J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 62: S67–S78.
Kauffmann T, Silberman M. Fetal Monitoring. Treasure Island (FL), 2023.
Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GML, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: 1–39.
Umana OD, Vadakekut ES, Siccardi MA. Antenatal Fetal Surveillance. Treasure Island (FL), 2024.
Rezaee Moradali M, Pazhohan A, Zareipour M, et al. Effectiveness of Non Stress Test on Fetal, Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes to Prevent Chronic Consequences in Delivery Health Centers. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care 2020; 9: 1–6.
Deshmukh S, Choudhary A, Jungari M, et al. Study of non-stress test as a screening tool in low risk pregnancies at term gestation. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020; 14: 7126–7131.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum Fetal Surveillance. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137: e116–e127.
Patange RP, Patil SS, Shah PD, et al. Non-stress test in high-risk pregnancy. Int J Curr Res Rev 2020; 12: 112–117.
Lear CA, Westgate JA, Ugwumadu A, et al. Understanding Fetal Heart Rate Patterns That May Predict Antenatal and Intrapartum Neural Injury. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2018; 28: 3–16.
Ben M’Barek I, Jauvion G, Ceccaldi PF. Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor – A state-of-the-art review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102: 130–137.
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML, et al. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017. Epub ahead of print 2017.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3.
Jepsen I, Blix E, Cooke H, et al. The overuse of intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) for low-risk women: An actor-network theory analysis of data from focus groups. Women and Birth 2022; 35: 593–601.
Deng Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, et al. A lightweight fetal distress-assisted diagnosis model based on a cross-channel interactive attention mechanism. Front Physiol 2023; 14: 1–13.
Ribeiro M, Nunes I, Castro L, et al. Machine learning models based on clinical indices and cardiotocographic features for discriminating asphyxia fetuses—Porto retrospective intrapartum study. Front Public Heal; 11. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1099263.
Spairani E, Steyde G, Tagliaferri S, et al. Fetal states identification in cardiotocographic tracings through discrete emissions multivariate hidden Markov models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2023; 240: 107736.
Ingemarsson I. Fetal monitoring during labor. Neonatology 2009; 95: 342–346.
Mendis L, Palaniswami M, Brownfoot F, et al. Computerised Cardiotocography Analysis for the Automated Detection of Fetal Compromise during Labour: A Review. Bioengineering 2023; 10: 1–28.
Ayres-De-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2015; 131: 13–24.
Copyright (c) 2025 I Gde Sastra Winata, Prayascita Mahendrata, Marchindy Paul Adrian Haning, Jessica Nathalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
