The Current Situation of ChatGPT Use in University Students’ Learning
Downloads
This study investigates the current use of ChatGPT in university students’ learning at Hanoi University of Textile Industry, focusing on their perceptions, skills, benefits, and challenges. A quantitative descriptive method was applied through an online survey of 528 valid responses, analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results reveal that 70% of students have used ChatGPT, and 36% use it regularly. Students rated ChatGPT as easy to use, time-saving, and helpful, with an average perception score of 4.03/5 and benefit score of 4.25/5. However, difficulties were found in information reliability (3.74/5) and prompt creation skills (3.00/5). The study concludes that ChatGPT positively supports learning, enhancing flexibility and personalized learning, but emphasizes the need for critical thinking and guided use. Appropriate orientation from teachers and institutions is crucial to help students apply AI as an ethical and effective educational tool.
Aydin, Ö. T. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Cao, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review and future directions. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
Dang, V. E., Nguyen, Đ. L. P., & Nguyen, T. H. (2024). The current application of ChatGPT in learning and research among students at Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City. Journal of Education, 24(1), 36–41.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2023). Understanding the impact of ChatGPT and generative AI on higher education: A research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, J., Lee, J., & Jang, K. M. (2024). Exploring the limitations in how ChatGPT introduces environmental justice issues in the United States: A case study of 3,108 counties. Telematics and Informatics, 86, 102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102085
Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(17), 4–19.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Qin, J., & Wang, Z. (2023). Integrating AI-powered tools into university education: Student perceptions and ethical considerations. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15123–15139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11943-7
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
Copyright (c) 2025 Do Thi Kim Dung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All Content should be original and unpublished.
