Fostering Autonomous Learning through Padlet Integration In EFL Writing at a Vietnamese Public High School
Downloads
Autonomous learning has been regarded as an important learning method for students’ achieving success in language learning, particularly in times of Vietnamese educational reforms and the new English language curriculum, where students are centered and able to improve their self-learning ability. While research mainly focuses on teacher beliefs in learner autonomy, there’s a lack of studies on EFL student’s perceptions and practices of autonomous learning in Vietnamese school settings. This study investigated the utilizing of Padlet to foster autonomous learning in EFL writing lessons among forty-four 10th graders at a public high school in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam. The quantitative data were collected with the use of questionnaires and qualitative insights from the teacher’s observations. Findings indicated that students held positive perceptions and demonstrated active participation in writing tasks through Padlet, suggesting its capacity to enhance self-directed learning. However, the study also acknowledged several challenges, including technical barriers, technical guidance shortage from teachers and time limitation. To resolve the obstacle and promote autonomous learning, the study recommended providing technical support to teachers and students, ensuring reliable and stable Internet access, and engaging students in writing tasks with clear expectations and criteria. Ultimately, it is important to incorporate digital tools, leverage students’ writing skills, and continuously reflect on teaching practices for better fostering autonomous learning among EFL school students in Vietnam.
Allwright, D. (1988). Autonomy and individualization in whole-class instruction. Individualization and Autonomy in Language Learning, 4(2), 35–44.
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, LMS, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378.
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Routledge.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding learner autonomy. ELT journal, 66(3), 283-292.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Breen, M. P., & Mann, S. (1997). Autonomy and the role of learners in the language learning process. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 37–53). Longman.
Bui, N. (2018). Learner autonomy in tertiary English classes in Vietnam. In English tertiary education in Vietnam (pp. 158–171). Routledge.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Online Submission.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dickinson, L. (1995). Autonomy and motivation: A literature review. System, 23(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5
Dollah, S., Sehuddin, M., & Sakkir, G. (2021). Motivating EFL learners to write using Padlet application. ELT Worldwide, 8(2), 240–254.
https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v8i2.25083
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
Hamilton, M. (2013). Autonomy and foreign language learning in a virtual learning environment.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon Press.
Holovina, S. (2021). The effectiveness of using Padlet for teaching English. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук, 2021(40), 70–76.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner Victoria. Australia: Deakin University.
Le, Q. X. (2013). Fostering learner autonomy in language learning in tertiary education: An intervention study of university students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).
Lien, T. T. N. (2022). E-learning and learner autonomy in EFL classes at tertiary institutions in Vietnam: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Language and Education Research, 14(1), 45–59.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: Some steps along the way. Future perspectives in foreign language education, 101, 15-25.
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Melvina, M., & Julia, J. (2021). Learner autonomy and English proficiency of Indonesian undergraduate students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 803–818.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Nguyen, D. M. T., & Trang, N. H. (2023). The effects of using peer feedback through Padlet on EFL students’ email writing and their learning motivation. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(6), 3400–3409.
Nguyen, T. C. L. (2009). Learner autonomy and EFL learning at the tertiary level in Vietnam (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington).
Nguyen, T. T., & Doan, M. H. (2021). English language proficiency and its impact on Vietnamese students' academic and career opportunities in a globalized world. Journal of Language and Education, 7(3), 56–67.
Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. (2017). A review of the literature on the integration of technology into the learning and teaching of English language skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n5p95
Rizki, S. M., Fitriani, S. S., Gani, S. A., & Samad, I. A. (2023). Autonomous learning model in online English classes: The benefits and challenges. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 303–320.
Roh, J., & Kim, T. (2019). Fostering learner autonomy through CALL and MALL in a Korean class: A case study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(2), 215–254.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and methods (Vol. 1, pp. 618–655). Wiley.
Salokangas, M., & Ainscow, M. (2017). Inside the autonomous school: Making sense of a global educational trend. Routledge.
Sarason, S. B. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. Teachers College Press.
Sari, A. B. P. (2019). EFL peer feedback through the chatroom in Padlet. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22(1), 46–57.
Sigal, N., Zabolotskaya, A., Plotnikova, N., Asmolovskaya, M., & Gutman, E. (2024). Students autonomy in mastering a foreign language as the basis for their lifelong learning readiness. In EDULEARN24 Proceedings (pp. 5191–5194). IATED.
Suhardiana, I. (2023). Developing Padlet-based hybrid e-portfolio assessment instruments for advancing student achievement, self-directed learning, and engagement in higher education’s advanced writing course (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha).
Tran, H. T. N. (2019). English language learner autonomy in the Vietnamese higher education context: Enabling factors and barriers arising from assessment practice (Doctoral dissertation).
Tuan, V. V., & Anh, H. B. (2023). Cross-cultural collectivistic and individualistic comparison between Vietnamese and Western cultures. In Handbook of research on cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 153–169). IGI Global.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
Van Loi, N. (2016). Learner autonomy in Vietnam: Insights from English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. In Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts (pp. 1–22).
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Prentice Hall.
Zahroh, M., Mawarni, V., & Harmayanthi, V. Y. (2023). Using Padlet on students’ writing skill as the essential effect. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education (Vol. 2, pp. 34–38).
Zhi, Q., & Su, M. (2015, October). Enhance collaborative learning by visualizing the process of knowledge building with Padlet. In 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) (pp. 221–225). IEEE.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Thi Thu Hien, Phan Thi Thanh Huyen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All Content should be original and unpublished.

