The Theory Agency in the Neuroscience Perspective
Downloads
The theory agency in neuroscience perspective. This research aims to know and analyze the correlation between the executive and the legislative can be created behaviour and corrupt thinking in neuroscience perspective. Data collection method was done by interview, data analyzes were done by subjunctive understanding interpretation than followed by reflexivity research. This research explained the correlation between the executive and the legislative in making decisions (judgment) will be faced by superiority power (discretionary power) in one other hands it was caused rent-seeking behaviour and corruption which in neuroscience perspective was interpreted as disturbed of human noble function was the result of all sorts of stimulates that created impulse and all sorts of the various trajectories on celebre cortex. Gnosis and Cognises disruption and low quality, awareness degree also emotional labiality so, the leadership will be neurotised as brain damage manifestation (brain damage) in spite of as psychogenic disorder symptoms.
Kamayanti, A. (2017). Qualitative Accounting (Introduction Scientific Religiosity). Foundation Peneleh House, South Jakarta.
Bernheim, B. D. (2009H). The Psychology and Neurobiology of Judgment and Decision Making: What's in it for Economists? In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Deciision Making and the Brain (pp. 115-126) .London: Elsevier (Acdemic Press).
Bossaerts, P., Preuschoff, K., & Hsu,M. (2009H). The Neuro Biological Foundations of Valuation in Human Decision Making Under Uncertainty. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (pp. 353-366). London: Elsevier (Academic Press).
Breedlove, S. M., Rosenzweig, M.R., & Watson, N.V. (2010). Biological Psychology: An Introduction to Behavioral, Cognitive, and Clinical Neuroscience. Sinauer Associates, Inc.; 6 edition (March 26, 2010)
Camerer, C. F. (2009H). Behavioral Game Theory and the Neural Basis of Strategic Choice. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics:
Decision Making and the Brain (pp. 193-206). London: Elsevier (Academic Press).
Camerer, C. F. (2008a). The case for mindful economics. In A. Caplin, & A. Schotter (Eds.), The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: a Handbook (pp. 43-69). New York: Oxford University Press.
Camerer, C. F. (2008b). The Potential of Neuroeconomics. Economicsand Philosophy, 24 (3), 369-379.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature , 43 (1), 9-64.
Caplin, A., & Dean, M. (2009H). Axiomatic Neuroeconomics. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (pp. 21-32). London: Elsevier (Academic Press).
Halim, A. dan Abdullah, S. (2006). Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintah Daerah.
Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintahan Volume 2, Nomor 1, Hal.: 53-64, 2006.
Ikrar, Taruna. (2015), Ilmu Neurosains Modern., Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, ISBN. 978-602-229-547-1.
Jensen & Meckling, 1976, The Theory of The Firm: Manajerial Behavioral, Agency Cost, and
Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial and Economic, 3:305-360.
Lane, Jan-Erik. 2000. The Public Sector – Concepts, Models and Approaches. London: SAGE Publications. _________. 2003a. Management and public organization: The principal-agent framework. University of Geneva and National University of Singapore. Working paper.
Lupia, Arthur & Mathew McCubbins. 1994. Who controls? Information and the structure of legislative decision making. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19(3):361-384.
Lupia, Arthur & Mathew McCubbins. 2000. Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. European Journal of Politica lResearch 37: 291-307
Moe, T. M. 1984. The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science 28(5): 739-777.
Ross, Stephen A. 1973. The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review 63(2): 134-139.
Sidharta, Triguna, (2015), Tata Pemeriksaan Klinis Dalam Neurologis, Dian Rakyat, Jakarta, ISBN. 978-523-308-4. Seabright, Paul. 1996. Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts models. European Economic Review 40: 61-89. The, Ishak., (2015), Informasi Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan, Grasindo, Jakarta.
Von Hagen, Jurgen. 2003. Budgeting institutions and public spending, in Shah, Anwar (ed.). 2003. Handbook on Public Sector Performance Reviews. Volume 1: Ensuring Accountability When There Is No Bottom Line. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank
