CEO Pay and Company Performance in the Food and Tobacco Industry

CEO, compensation, agent, principle

Authors

  • Kevin J. Sigler, PhD 601 S. College Road, Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, NC 28403
June 8, 2016

Downloads

Chief executive officers for companies in competitive industries are motivated to maximize shareholder wealth and not shirk job responsibility since lack of effort could result in firm bankruptcy or a takeover from a competing firm. On the other hand, CEOs of firms, enjoying large market share and product differentiation from competitors, may not be as motivated. For these types of firm shareholders may be best served linking executive pay to firm performance to insure the convergence of management and owner interests. This paper tests the link between CEO total compensation for a sample of large firms in the food and tobacco industry, an industry dominated by large companies. The results support the principle-agent theory that lack of competition in an industry may encourage firms to tie the pay of their top executive to the performance of the company. The coefficient for the performance variable, return on equity, is significant in explaining the variation in total compensation for the chief executive officers in the 15 food and tobacco companies in the sample.